RENOISE TRIPLETS HOW TO
These are not complaints rather my feedback on how my limitations intersect with nerdseq featureset.Īnd posed as a question, I would ask "any advice on how to improve my understanding of nerdseq to save my use of this tool" I have a fixed cube of space in which I have declared my setup must fit, and if I am not get use out of something, even if it is my fault as a bad musician with weak mental powers, I should sell it. I still really love the idea of the nerdseq, but I have to be ruthless with myself and not hoard gear. Triggering the nerdseq from external, using nerdseq as a "pattern instrument" - this as far as I know, doesnt really fit the nerdseq, but it feels like it should be a core usecase. not a "fair" comparison, but it is my gear close at hand. this gives a lot of room to create a partially repeating or non repeating pattern and with any kind of notes - 64th, triplets, whatever I can play. key sequences (for me ) are not ergonomic, has to be done crouched over the modular rack.īeats per measure vs screen real estate - if I want my time division to be equal to 32nd notes, this means I can never see the entire sequence on one screen.īeats per measure vs pattern length - on my mc 909 I can create, lets say a 32 bar pattern. Interface is small for my fingers to type compared to computer keyboard. I am sure the problem is me, but I notice the same patterns slowing me down on the nerdseq.
Playing in rhythms to be recorded in my mc 909Įditing rhythms in the piano roll of FL Studio and then playing them through ES-3 ADAT into Squarp Rample or mc 909 go!" but the tools that got me results in order of decreasing ease were It was simple up front but with a lot of complexity hidden behind, the timing is great, a lot of i/o.īut I have been using it less and less, and after I moved my studio downstairs the nerdseq was among some gear that never got turned back on, and then I got around to it and one night was like "ok, beat creation powers.
0 kommentar(er)
